In ,
compute
and . The
first is ,
and , so it is . The second is , so it is as well. The rule
“”, the classic error of school algebra, is a
theorem when is
the characteristic of the field. This
section proves it, and deduces Fermat’s little theorem
from it with the rigidity of Section 4.5: a homomorphism
of to itself
is the identity.
The tool is the binomial theorem, which Chapter 1
proves in an arbitrary commutative ring, with the
binomial coefficients acting as natural multiples.
The
binomial theorem, recalled
Chapter 1 proved what this section needs about finite
sums and the binomial theorem, for every commutative
ring. Finite sums obey the rules of Lemma 1.1.3
(Section 1.1). The binomial coefficients are defined
by Pascal’s rule, without division, in Definition 1.2.1
(Section 1.2), where the table of their first rows also
stands, and they satisfy the absorption rule Proposition 1.2.1.
They act on ring elements as natural multiples, with the
laws of Lemma 1.1.2,
which Lemma 4.5.1 extends to
integer multiples in Section 4.5. And the binomial
theorem itself, holds for any in a commutative ring (Theorem 1.2.3);
for it is
the familiar expansion, since there (Section
4.5). Chapter 1 also proves the closed form (Proposition 1.2.2);
this section does not use it, since in the factorial is .
In row of the
table of Section 1.2, the four middle entries are all
multiples of ; in
row the middle
entries and
are not
multiples of .
Primes are special.
Lemma
4.6.1 (A Prime Divides the Middle Binomial
Coefficients)
Let be a prime
and with
.
Then .
The hypothesis “prime” is needed: , and
. In the
proof, , but , so
Euclid’s lemma does not apply.
Quick check. Use Proposition 1.2.1
to compute from , and
check that
divides it.
Solution. With , : , so , and
. (By
Pascal’s rule, ,
the same.)
The
Frobenius map
We can now expand in a field of characteristic .
Theorem
4.6.2 (The Frobenius Homomorphism)
Let be a field
of characteristic .
- (a) For all , and . So the Frobenius map , , is a homomorphism, and it is
injective.
- (b) for
all .
- (c) If is finite, then is an
automorphism of .
By Theorem 4.5.3, the
hypothesis already makes prime.
Try it first (ten minutes): expand and in , using the rows
and of the table in
Section 1.2, and see which coefficients
survive.
Idea. For the
coefficients become in , and .
For the
coefficients become , and : the extra terms survive because is not the
characteristic. So the plan is: expand by the binomial
theorem; every middle coefficient is a
multiple of ; and
a multiple of
acts on as , because . The
product rule and are power laws, and injectivity is free for a
homomorphism of fields.
Before reading on: where is it used that is prime?
Proof.
(a) By Theorem 1.2.3,
with . Let
. By
Lemma 4.6.1, , so
by Proposition 4.5.2 (a), and
then, by Lemma 4.5.1 (c) and Theorem 4.1.1 (d), The end terms are and . Let for
and
otherwise, and for and otherwise. Since , for every
, so
by Lemma 1.1.3
(a) and (d), which is by (F1). Next, by Proposition 1.1.1
(c), and by
induction (,
and ). So is a
homomorphism (Definition 4.4.1), and it
is injective by Proposition 4.4.1
(c).
(b) By Proposition 4.4.1 (a),
.
(c) The image
is a
subset of , and
, with
codomain , is a
bijection by (a). If ,
this would be a bijection from the finite set onto a proper subset,
which Sets and Functions, Theorem 4.1.9
forbids. So , is bijective,
and a bijective homomorphism is an
automorphism (Definition 4.4.1). This
proves the theorem.
Answer to the prompt. Primality is used in
one place: Lemma 4.6.1, whose proof
needs Euclid’s lemma, and so needs prime. It costs nothing
here, since a positive characteristic is always prime
(Theorem 4.5.3).
In words: in characteristic , raising to the -th power respects sums.
The map is not the identity in general; Exercise C3 of
Section 4.5 found that on the four-element field it
exchanges two elements. On itself it is the
identity, and that is Fermat’s little theorem.
Warning. “” is
not a general rule. In a field of characteristic it holds for
(Theorem 4.6.2 (a)), and so
for by
Exercise B2 (and in the same way for every power of
). With other
exponents it can fail: in , , while
. In a
ring of composite characteristic it can fail even with
equal to the
characteristic: in , which has
characteristic ,
, while ; the middle coefficient is not a
multiple of . In
the identity
fails for every : .
Fermat’s
little theorem
On , the
Frobenius map is a homomorphism , and by
Corollary 4.5.6 (b) there
is only one such map, the identity. That is the whole
proof of the first part below.
Theorem
4.6.3 (Fermat’s Little Theorem)
Let be a
prime.
- (a) for every .
- (b) for every
non-zero ; so .
- (c) For every , ; and if
, then
.
Proof.
(a) (Example (The characteristics of the standard fields)),
so is a homomorphism by Theorem 4.6.2 (a). By Corollary 4.5.6 (b), the
only homomorphism is the identity. Hence
for every .
(b) Let . Since , and , by (F6), the power recursion
and (a). Canceling (Theorem 4.1.1 (b)) gives
.
Likewise and , so by
uniqueness of inverses (Theorem 4.1.1
(c)).
(c) Write for the class of
in . Since
(Theorem 2.3.1
(b)), induction on gives for every
: , and
. By (a), , so
(Theorem 2.3.1
(a), for the ideal ). If , then (Theorem 2.3.1
(d)), so by (b), and . This
proves the theorem.
Primality is needed in (c). For the modulus and , is not a
multiple of (in
this is
, from the warning above), and although
, is not a
multiple of
either.
Part (b) gives a second way to invert in , besides the
Euclidean algorithm of Chapter 2 (Theorem 2.1.4):
.
It also reduces large exponents: for non-zero , only the remainder of
the exponent on division by matters, since
. Exercise C2 below gives a second
proof of (a), by induction, and Chapter 6 gives another
proof of (b), from a product of all the non-zero
elements.
Example
(Powers and inverses in prime fields)
- (i) Compute in .
- (ii) Compute in .
- (iii) Find the
inverse of in
twice: by
Theorem 4.6.3 (b), and by
the Euclidean algorithm.
- (iv) What is the
Frobenius map of ?
Solution.
(i) is prime (the
small-primes remark of Section 2.2) and in , so by Theorem 4.6.3 (b). Since
, the power laws give , and . So in .
(ii) is prime: by the
remark after Lemma 2.2.4
it suffices that no with and , that
is ,
divides , and
the remainders of on division by are . Since in , Theorem 4.6.3 (b) gives
. No multiplication was needed.
(iii) is prime by the same
test ( leave remainders ). By
Fermat: since in , Theorem 4.6.3 (b) gives
.
Square repeatedly in : , ,
, . With , By Euclid: and
,
so and by Theorem 2.4.1.
Both routes give .
Check: . For small the Euclidean algorithm
is shorter; Fermat’s route needs no back-substitution,
only squaring.
(iv) The
identity, by Theorem 4.6.3 (a):
for every .
Quick check. Compute in and in , with and
without Theorem 4.6.3.
Solution. Both are . Without it: ;
and , so . With it: and are prime, in and in , and the
exponents are
and .
Exercises
A. Check your
understanding
Exercise
(A1)
These parts are about Theorem 4.6.2 and its
proof.
- (a) Where in the
proof of (a) is it used that is prime, and why does
the theorem not need “ prime” as a separate
hypothesis?
- (b) List for and for . Which are
divisible by , and
which by ?
- (c) Why is injective?
Does the proof use that is finite?
- (d) State the idea
of the proof of (a) in two sentences.
Solution.
(a) In Lemma 4.6.1, through
Euclid’s lemma: gives only
because , which needs prime. A positive
characteristic is always prime (Theorem 4.5.3), so “” already includes it.
(b) Row : ; the
four middle ones are divisible by , the end ones are not.
Row : ;
only the two ’s
are divisible by ,
and , are not. This is why
in a ring of characteristic such as .
(c) Every
homomorphism of fields is injective (Proposition 4.4.1 (c)):
only for . The
proof of injectivity does not use finiteness; finiteness
is used only for surjectivity in (c).
(d) Expand by the binomial
theorem; every middle coefficient is a
multiple of . In
characteristic ,
, so
every middle term vanishes and only
remains.
B. Practice
Exercise
(B1)
Compute
in , and
find the inverse of in by Theorem 4.6.3.
Solution. is prime (no with divides it,
and ; the remark after Lemma 2.2.4),
and in
. By Theorem 4.6.3 (b), . Since ,
in . For the
inverse, . Now , so and . Check:
. Hence and .
Exercise
(B2)
Let be a field
of characteristic .
- (a) Show that for all .
- (b) Show that for all and .
Solution.
(a) is a homomorphism, as a composite
of homomorphisms (Proposition 4.4.1 (e)), and
by the
power law . Applying its additivity to gives the
claim.
(b) Induction on
. For both sides are
: the empty sum is
, and
as . If the
claim holds for ,
split off the last term and use Theorem 4.6.2 (a):
Exercise
(B3)
Let be a
prime. Show that the solutions of are exactly
the non-zero elements, and that every satisfies
.
Solution. Every non-zero satisfies by Theorem 4.6.3 (b). The
element does not:
since ,
. So the solutions are exactly the
non-zero elements. And for every by Theorem 4.6.3 (a).
C. Going deeper
Exercise
(C1: Exit check: the Frobenius identity)
Let be a field
of characteristic . Using Theorem 1.2.3
and Lemma 4.6.1, prove that
, , is an injective homomorphism.
Solution. Sums. By Theorem 1.2.3,
. For , by Lemma 4.5.1 (c). By Lemma 4.6.1, , and
since , (Proposition 4.5.2 (a)); so
the term is (Theorem 4.1.1 (d)). The
terms and
are and
,
since and . A sum
whose terms vanish except at two places is the sum of
those two terms (Lemma 1.1.3
(a), (d)), so .
Products and one. by the
power law , and . So is a
homomorphism (Definition 4.4.1).
Injective. Every homomorphism of fields is
injective (Proposition 4.4.1 (c)).
Marking scheme. (10 points)
- 2: the binomial expansion written with integer
multiples .
- 2: each middle term reduced to a multiple that
vanishes, with the rule named (for example by , or where ).
- 2: that multiple is from and
, with both reasons named.
- 1: the end terms and .
- 1: and .
- 2: injectivity, by Proposition 4.4.1 (c) or by
any correct direct argument.
Second route for injectivity: earns the 2 points, 1 for
with its reason (Proposition 4.4.1 (a), or
for
every prime , the
even one included), and 1 for because a field
has no zero divisors.
Fatal errors (0 for the step): “” as an
integer; using in its own proof.
Solution.
(a) For : , as . If , then by Theorem 4.6.2 (a) (, Example (The characteristics of the standard fields)),
Every element of is for some
(Theorem 2.3.3
(b)), and (part (d) there). So for every .
(b) Let . Then , so by (a). By
induction on ,
,
using
(Theorem 2.3.1
(b)), as in the proof of Theorem 4.6.3 (c). So , and (Theorem 2.3.1
(a), for the ideal ). (This proves only
what Theorem 4.6.3 already
gives; it is practice with the Frobenius identity, and
nothing cites it.)
Exercise
(C3: Roots of order p)
Let be a
finite field of characteristic . Show that for every
the
equation
has exactly one solution . Deduce that in
, the only
solution of
is .
Solution. By Corollary 4.5.7 (a), is a prime, so , and by Theorem 4.6.2 (c), is a
bijection .
Surjectivity gives a solution of , and
injectivity says there is at most one. In , is a solution by Theorem 4.6.3 (a), , so it is the
only one. The uniqueness half needs only that is injective,
so it holds in every field of characteristic (Theorem 4.6.2 (a));
existence used the finiteness of .
R. Review
Exercise
(R1)
Find all with , and explain why there are exactly two.
Solution. By the square-root
formula of Proposition 3.4.1,
with , :
(since ), , , and , so . Check: . By Corollary 4.1.2 in the
field (Example (The Fields , and )), if and only if
or . So the solutions
are and
. They are
two, not one: would give , hence , since in
(, Example (The characteristics of the standard fields),
with Proposition 4.5.2 (b)).
Exercise
(R2)
Show that has
no square root in .
Solution. Suppose with
.
Expanding, , so by unique
representation (@prp-cof-sqrt2-field-archimedean
(a)), and
.
Since in
(, Example (The characteristics of the standard fields),
with Proposition 4.5.2 (b)), Theorem 4.1.1 (f) applied
twice (to , then to ) gives or . If , then . If , then , so . Both are excluded by the claim stated with
@prp-cof-sqrt2-field-incomplete:
no natural number
with for some is the square of a rational; take , as , and
,
as . So
has no square root in . This is the
method by which Section 4.3 showed the same for (@prp-cof-sqrt2-field-incomplete).
Solution. . In , , by the definition of the sum, with
coefficients in . So and , while every ordered field has characteristic
(Example (The characteristics of the standard fields)).
This is the method of Theorem 2.3.3
(e) and Number Systems: From to , Example (A field with two elements that cannot be ordered):
in an ordered field for (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.4.3
(h)), while here .
.
This is the method of Proposition 3.4.3;
the proposition itself does not apply, since an order on
the subfield
need not extend to . Suppose made an ordered field.
Then gives
, and
gives (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.4.3
(e)). But
(Proposition 3.1.1;
the operations of are those of ), and gives (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.4.3
(a)). So , and by transitivity, which is impossible for the
strict part of an order. The characteristic does not
help here, since (Example (The characteristics of the standard fields)):
the obstruction for is a square, not a
multiple of .
Exercise
(R4)
Find all homomorphisms .
Solution. There are exactly two:
the inclusion , and .
Every homomorphism is one of them. Let be a homomorphism. The inclusions and
are
homomorphisms (Example (Conjugation and Other Automorphisms)
(ii); is a
subfield of both), so they are and
by the
uniqueness clause of Theorem 4.5.5 (b) (both
fields have characteristic , Example (The characteristics of the standard fields)).
By Corollary 4.5.6 (a), : for every
. Then
so or by Corollary 4.1.2 in . Hence .
Both occur. The inclusion is a homomorphism
(Example (Conjugation and Other Automorphisms)
(ii)), and so is conjugation of followed by the inclusion (Example (Conjugation and Other Automorphisms)
(iii) and Proposition 4.4.1 (e)).
They differ at , since .
The tool, and the look-alikes. The tool is
rigidity on the prime subfield (Corollary 4.5.6) followed
by “push the equation through ”. The uniqueness
theorem for complete ordered fields of Number
Systems: From
to ,
Chapter 6 (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 6.3.4)
does not apply: it concerns maps of a complete ordered
field to itself, and is not
complete. Nor does “a homomorphism into an ordered field
preserves order”: the second homomorphism sends to .