1.4  Estimates for Limits

Number Systems, Chapter 4 defined what an→a means in an ordered field (Number Systems: From N to R, Definition 4.3.2) and proved the limit laws. It also gave a method for proving a limit from the definition (Number Systems: From N to R, Example (Method: proving a limit from the definition)). The method bounds the distance by C/(n+1) for n≥n0, by enlarging numerators and shrinking denominators, and then takes N:=max{N′,n0}. This section does not teach that method again. It adds two ways to find the bound when the expression is less tame: keep the dominant term of a quotient, and bound a power from below by one term of the binomial theorem. Analysis on the Real Line uses all three.

Throughout, sequences are sequences in R, a complete ordered field (Number Systems: From N to R, Theorem 5.5.2), and n stands for n⋅1, as in Number Systems. Where a formula such as 1/n needs n≥1, the sequence starts at n=1. Such a sequence is the shift by one of a sequence indexed from 0, and a shift changes no limit (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.3.2 (b)).

1.4.1. The method, recalled

The method of Number Systems: From N to R, Example (Method: proving a limit from the definition) has four steps.

  • (1) Bring the distance |an−a| to one fraction.
  • (2) Bound it, for every n≥n0, by a constant C>0 over n+1.
  • (3) Choose a threshold N′ for that bound, and let N:=max{N′,n0}.
  • (4) Write the proof forwards: ε first, then N, then an arbitrary n≥N.

In R two remarks simplify the work. First, step (3) always succeeds. R is complete, hence Archimedean (Number Systems: From N to R, Theorem 6.1.2). So Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.2.3 applies to it.

Second, a bound C/n for n≥1 serves as well as C/(n+1). Since R is Archimedean, there is an integer N′>C/ε. Then 1/N′<ε/C, because reciprocals reverse the order of positive numbers (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 3.2.2 (b)). So C/n≤C/N′<ε for every n≥N′, because a larger denominator gives a smaller quotient (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c)).

Example (A first estimate in R)

Show that an:=n+32n2−1→0 in R.

Solution. The numbers (1)–(4) are the four steps of the method.

  1. For n≥1, 2n2−1≥1>0 and n+3>0, so the distance |an−0| is an itself.

  2. Let n≥3. Then n+3≤n+n=2n. Also n2≥1, so 2n2−1=n2+(n2−1)≥n2>0. A larger denominator gives a smaller quotient, so 1/(2n2−1)≤1/n2. Multiplying these two inequalities between non-negative numbers, 0<an≤2n⋅1n2=2n(n≥3). So n0=3 and C=2.

  3. Let ε>0. Choose an integer N′>2/ε and let N:=max{3,N′}. It depends on ε only.

  4. Let n≥N. Then n≥3, so the bound of (2) applies, and 2/n≤2/N since n≥N: |an−0|=an≤2n≤2N<ε, where the last step uses N≥N′>2/ε. Hence an→0.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient), (d) (multiplying inequalities).

Both bounds in step (2) needed a range. The bound n+3≤2n fails at n=2. The bound 2n2−1≥n2 holds from n=1 on. Here the ranges were found at sight. When the terms do not simplify so readily, two techniques find them: keeping the dominant term, and bounding a power from below.

1.4.2. Keeping the dominant term

Take 2n2+3nn2−5. For large n the terms 2n2 and n2 swamp the others, and the quotient should be close to 2. To bound a quotient from above we need its numerator from above and its denominator from below. Enlarging a numerator is easy. Shrinking a denominator that contains a subtraction is where care is needed, because n2−5 is negative for small n.

Example (Method: keep the dominant term)

How it goes. In a quotient of sums, keep the term that grows fastest and absorb the others into it. From some n0 on, a lower-order term is at most a fixed fraction of the dominant term. For example, 5≤12n2 once n≥4, so n2−5≥12n2 there. Then the quotient is bounded by a quotient of single powers. This is the bounding step of the method of Number Systems: From N to R, Example (Method: proving a limit from the definition), with n0 the largest of the ranges used.

When to use it. Rational expressions in n, possibly with n.

Common mistakes. Subtracting in the denominator without stating a range. For instance, n2−5≥12n2 is false for n≤3.

Example (A limit that is not zero)

Show that an:=2n2+3nn2−5→2.

Solution.

  1. No natural number has square 5, so every an is defined. For n≥3, n2≥9>5, and an−2=2n2+3n−2(n2−5)n2−5=3n+10n2−5>0, so the distance is |an−2|=3n+10n2−5.

  2. Keep the dominant terms, 3n on top and n2 below. Let n≥4. Then 3n≥12≥10, so 3n+10≤6n. And 12n2≥12⋅16=8≥5, so n2−5≥12n2>0. Inverting the second, which reverses it, and multiplying by the first, |an−2|≤6n⋅2n2=12n(n≥4).

  3. Let ε>0. Choose an integer N′>12/ε and let N:=max{4,N′}. It depends on ε only.

  4. For n≥N: |an−2|≤12/n≤12/N<ε. Hence an→2.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient), (d) (multiplying inequalities).

The candidate limit 2 is the ratio of the leading coefficients. Reading off the dominant terms is how the limit is guessed, and the method is how the guess is proved. The range n≥4 came from two requirements, 3n≥10 and 12n2≥5, and the larger of their thresholds serves both.

Quick check. For which n∈N is n2−7n≥12n2?

Solution. The inequality says 12n2≥7n, that is, n(12n−7)≥0. For n=0 it holds with equality. For n≥1 the factor n is positive, so it holds exactly when 12n≥7, that is, n≥14. So the inequality holds for n=0 and for every n≥14, and fails for 1≤n≤13. A proof that uses n2−7n≥12n2 takes n0=14.

1.4.3. Powers

Every bound so far came from dropping or absorbing terms of a sum. A power rn has only one term, and there is nothing to drop. Bernoulli’s inequality and the binomial theorem turn it into a sum, and a sum of non-negative terms is at least any one of its terms.

The first case is the geometric sequence. For |r|≥1 the terms rn do not shrink, and for |r|<1 they should tend to 0. Take r=12 first. Then (12)n=1/2n, and Bernoulli’s inequality gives 2n=(1+1)n≥1+n>n. So (12)n<1/n for every n≥1, a bound of the form C/n with C=1. The proposition below does the same for every r with 0<|r|<1, by writing 1/|r| as 1+h.

Proposition 1.4.1 (Geometric Sequences Tend to Zero)

Let r∈R with |r|<1.

  • (a) If r≠0 and h:=1|r|−1, then h>0 and |r|n<1nh for every integer n≥1.
  • (b) rn→0.

Idea (Scratch work). The goal, from Number Systems: From N to R, Definition 4.3.2, is |rn−0|=|r|n<ε for every n beyond some N. Solving |r|n<ε for n would need a logarithm, which we do not have yet. So we follow the bounding step of the method and look for a simpler bound of the form C/n.

The trouble is that |r|n is a small number. The tools we have, Bernoulli’s inequality and the binomial theorem, bound powers of numbers above 1 from below. So we turn small into large: we write |r| as the reciprocal of a number above 1, |r|=11+h,h:=1|r|−1>0, so that |r|n=1/(1+h)n. Now |r|n is small as soon as (1+h)n is large, and a lower bound (1+h)n≥Cn is enough. Bernoulli’s inequality supplies one at once: (1+h)n≥1+nh>nh.

We know We want
0<|r|<1 |r|n below every ε>0 for large n
h:=1|r|−1>0, so |r|n=1(1+h)n enough: (1+h)n bounded below by Cn
Sets and Functions, Theorem 3.3.7: (1+h)n≥1+nh>nh |r|n<1nh: the bounding step of the method with C=1h; the gap is closed

The proof follows these rows from top to bottom. It then finishes with the choice of the threshold and the forward proof, using the bound 1/(nh).

Proof.

  • (a) Let r≠0. Then 0<|r|<1, since the absolute value of a non-zero number is positive. Reciprocals reverse the order of positive numbers, so 1/|r|>1/1=1, that is, h>0. By the choice of h, 1+h=1/|r|, so |r|=1/(1+h) and |r|n=1/(1+h)n. Since h≥−1, Bernoulli’s inequality (Sets and Functions, Theorem 3.3.7) gives (1+h)n≥1+nh>nh. For n≥1, nh>0 as a product of positive numbers. So 0<nh<(1+h)n, and taking reciprocals reverses the inequality: |r|n=1/(1+h)n<1/(nh).

  • (b) If r=0, then rn=rn−1⋅0=0 for every n≥1, so |rn−0|=0<ε for every ε>0 and every n≥1. So N:=1 works for every ε>0. Let r≠0 and ε>0, and let h be as in (a). Then hε>0. Since R is Archimedean, Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.2.3 gives N∈Z>0 with 1/n<hε for every n≥N. This N depends on ε and on r, through h. Let n≥N. Then n≥1, and |rn|=|r|n by induction on n, since |xy|=|x||y|. By (a), |rn−0|=|r|n<1nh<hεh=ε. This proves rn→0.

Part (a) is the useful half. It gives an explicit bound, valid for every n≥1, from which a threshold can be read off for any tolerance.

Quick check. From Proposition 1.4.1 (a), find an N with (0.9)n<0.01 for every n≥N.

Solution. Here r=0.9=910, so h=109−1=19 and (0.9)n<1n/9=9n for n≥1. Now 9n≤1100 exactly when n≥900. So N=900 works: for n≥900, (0.9)n<9/n≤0.01. The bound is wasteful, since already (0.9)44<0.01. That costs nothing: the definition asks for some threshold, not the least.

The same steps handle a power in a denominator under a numerator that is a power of n: write the base as 1+h, keep one term of the expansion, and invert.

Example (Method: bound a power from below)

How it goes. To make a quotient small when its denominator contains rn with r>1:

When to use it. Quotients np/rn. Powers |r|n with |r|<1, through 1/|r|=1+h. The n-th roots of Section 1.5.

Common mistakes. One mistake is to choose k too small: then the bound does not tend to 0. Another is to use the binomial bound with h<0.

In Example (A lower bound for powers of two) the base was 2, and k=2 gave n/2n≤2/(n−1) for n≥2. The same steps work for every base r>1. The numerator is n, to the first power, so k=2.

Proposition 1.4.2 (Powers Beat n)

Let r>1 and h:=r−1. Then nrn≤4nh2 for every integer n≥2, and nrn→0.

Idea. Follow Example (Method: bound a power from below) step by step. Write r=1+h. Keep the term k=2, which is of order n2. Bound n(n−1) below by 12n2. Invert, multiply by n, and finish the limit with C=4/h2.

Proof. Let n≥2. Since r>1, h>0. By Corollary 1.2.4 (b) with x=h and k=2≤n, and since (n2)⋅2=n(n−1), rn=(1+h)n≥(n2)h2=n(n−1)2h2. Since n≥2, n2≥1, so n−1≥n2≥0. Multiplying the inequalities 0≤n2≤n−1 and 0≤n≤n, between non-negative numbers, gives n(n−1)≥n22. Hence rn≥n2h24>0. Inverting, which reverses the inequality, and multiplying by n>0, nrn≤n⋅4n2h2=4nh2. For the limit, n/rn>0, so the distance to 0 is n/rn≤C/n for n≥2, with C:=4/h2. Let ε>0, choose an integer N′>C/ε, and let N:=max{2,N′}. It depends on ε and r. For n≥N, |n/rn−0|≤C/n≤C/N<ε. So n/rn→0.

Uses: Proposition 1.2.2 (c) ((n2)⋅2=n(n−1)); Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient), (d) (multiplying inequalities).

With k=1, that is, Bernoulli’s inequality, the same steps give only n/rn<n/(nh)=1/h. That bound does not tend to 0. The choice of k is the whole difference.

A comparison with a power can also run the other way: a sequence that is hard to handle directly is bounded by a geometric one, and Proposition 1.4.1 finishes.

Example (Factorials beat powers of two)

Show that 1n!≤12n−1<2n for every integer n≥1, and hence that 1n!→0.

Solution. The first inequality. We show n!≥2n−1 for n≥1, by induction on n. For n=1: 1!=1=20. Suppose n!≥2n−1. Also n+1≥2, and both inequalities are between non-negative numbers, so we may multiply them: (n+1)!=n!(n+1)≥2n−1⋅2=2n. Here 2n−1>0, as a power of a positive number, and n!≥2n−1>0. So inverting reverses the inequality, and 1/n!≤1/2n−1.

The second inequality. By Proposition 1.4.1 (a) with r=12, h=2−1=1, we have (12)n<1n for n≥1. Since 1/2n−1=(12)n−1=2⋅(12)n, 12n−1=2(12)n<2n.

The limit. So 0<1/n!<2/n for n≥1: a bound C/n with C=2. Given ε>0, take an integer N>2/ε. It depends on ε only. Then N≥1, and for n≥N, |1/n!−0|<2/n≤2/N<ε. Hence 1/n!→0.

Uses: Sets and Functions, Definition 3.3.1 ((n+1)!=n!(n+1)); Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (d) (multiplying inequalities), (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient); Sets and Functions, Proposition 3.3.4 (1/2n−1=2(12)n), (e) (2n−1>0).

Warning. 1n2≤ε is not 1n2<ε. The definition of a limit asks for the strict inequality. A threshold chosen to make the bound at most ε can miss it. For ε=1, the choice N:=1/ε=1 gives, at n=N=1, the distance 112=1, which is not <1. Ask for N>C/ε, strictly.

Second readingWhen the one-term bound fails

Change one hypothesis of Corollary 1.2.4 (b): keep k=2 and allow h<0. At h=−1, n=2 the claim would read (1−1)2≥(22)(−1)2, that is, 0≥1, which is false. What breaks is the step that keeps one term of a sum. That step needs every term non-negative, and with h<0 the terms (nj)hj alternate in sign. Bernoulli’s inequality survives for −1≤h<0, because its proof is an induction, not a dropped sum. So for 0<|r|<1 the method first passes to 1/|r|=1+h with h>0, as the proof of Proposition 1.4.1 did. It never expands (1+(r−1))n directly.

1.4.4. Exercises

A. Check your understanding

Exercise (A1)
  • (a) Write the negation of “an→0” with all its quantifiers.
  • (b) In Example (A first estimate in R), on what does N depend? Could it depend on n?
  • (c) Name the method used: nn3+7≤1n2 for n≥1.
  • (d) True or false: if |an|≤5n for every n≥10, then an→0.

Solution.

B. Practice

Exercise (B1: Say which method, then complete it)

Show that an:=n+52n→0. Start: write 2=1+1. By Corollary 1.2.4 (b) with k=2, 2n≥n(n−1)2≥n24 for n≥2. Say which method this is, then complete it.

Solution. The method: bound the power from below, as in Example (Method: bound a power from below). The numerator is handled by keeping its dominant term, as in Example (Method: keep the dominant term).

Let n≥5. Then n+5≤2n. By the start, 2n≥n2/4>0, so 1/2n≤4/n2. Multiplying, 0<an≤2n⋅4n2=8n. Let ε>0, take an integer N′>8/ε and N:=max{5,N′}. For n≥N, |an−0|≤8/n≤8/N<ε. Hence an→0.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient), (d) (multiplying inequalities).

Exercise (B2: Put the proof in order)

The claim is an:=2n+1n+1→2. Put the lines below in an order that proves it, and say which line does not belong.

  • (i) Let ε>0.
  • (ii) For n≥N, |an−2|=1n+1<1n≤1N<ε.
  • (iii) Choose N∈N with N>1/ε and N≥1.
  • (iv) Choose N:=n+1.
  • (v) Hence an→2.
  • (vi) |an−2|=|2n+1−2n−2n+1|=1n+1 for every n∈N.

Solution. An admissible order is (i), (iii), (vi), (ii), (v). Line (vi) uses nothing chosen, so it may also come first: (vi), (i), (iii), (ii), (v). Line (ii) must come after (iii), since it uses N. It must also come after (vi), since it uses the formula for the distance. In (ii), 1/n≤1/N holds because a larger denominator gives a smaller quotient, and 1/N<ε follows from N>1/ε.

The line that does not belong is (iv): it makes N depend on n, but N must be fixed before n is named, and n ranges over all numbers ≥N.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient); Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 3.2.2 (b) (reciprocals reverse <).

Exercise (B3: Prove or disprove)

Prove each true statement and refute each false one. In parts (a), (b), (c) and (e), an denotes the n-th term of the sequence in question.

  • (a) n2+1n3→0.
  • (b) nn+1→0.
  • (c) (−1)nn→0.
  • (d) For every ε>0, every integer n≥1/ε has 1n2<ε.
  • (e) 2nn!→0.

Solution.

  • (a) True. For n≥1, n2+1≤2n2, so 0<an≤2n2/n3=2/n. Given ε>0, take an integer N>2/ε. Then N≥1, and for n≥N, |an|≤2/n≤2/N<ε.

  • (b) False. For n≥1, 2n≥n+1, so nn+1≥12. Take ε:=12. For every N∈N, the index n:=max{N,1}≥N has |an−0|≥12=ε. This is the negation of A1 (a).

  • (c) True. |an−0|=|(−1)n|/n=1/n, since |xy|=|x||y| and |(−1)n|=1. Given ε, an integer N>1/ε works, as in (a).

  • (d) False. Take ε=1 and n=1≥1/ε. Then 1/n2=1, which is not <1. The non-strict 1/n2≤ε does not give the strict 1/n2<ε.

  • (e) True. For n≥3, n!=1⋅2⋅∏k=3nk. Also 2n/n!=∏k=1n(2/k), by induction on n from 2n+1/(n+1)!=(2n/n!)⋅(2/(n+1)). So 2nn!=21⋅22⋅∏k=3n2k≤2⋅1⋅2n=4n. Every factor 2k with 3≤k<n lies in (0,1], so their product lies in (0,1]. The last factor, k=n, is kept. Given ε>0, take an integer N′>4/ε and N:=max{3,N′}. For n≥N, |an|≤4/n≤4/N<ε.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.3 (b) (|xy|=|x||y|); Number Systems: From N to R, Example (First Limits) (d) (|(−1)n|=1); Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (d) (multiplying inequalities); Sets and Functions, Definition 3.3.1 (the recursion of products and factorials, for 2n/n!=∏k=1n(2/k) and the splitting of n!).

C. Going deeper

Exercise (C1: Chapter check: a rational limit)

Prove from the definition that an:=3n2−nn2+4→3.

Solution. Let ε>0. The goal is an N with |an−3|<ε for every n≥N.

The distance. For every n, an−3=3n2−n−3(n2+4)n2+4=−(n+12)n2+4, so |an−3|=n+12n2+4.

The bound. Let n≥1. Then n+12≤n+12n=13n, and n2+4≥n2>0, so 1/(n2+4)≤1/n2. Multiplying, |an−3|≤13n/n2=13/n.

The threshold. Choose an integer N>13/ε. Then N≥1, and N depends on ε only. For n≥N, n≥1, so |an−3|≤13n≤13N<ε, where the middle step holds because n≥N and the last because N>13/ε. Hence an→3.

What a complete answer needs. (10 points)

  • 2: fixes ε>0 arbitrary and states the goal.
  • 3: computes |an−3| exactly.
  • 3: bounds it by C/n (or C/(n+1)) on a stated range n≥n0, with each inequality justified.
  • 2: chooses N before n, depending only on ε, and ends the chain with a strict <ε.

Slips that lose the step. Letting N depend on n. Bounding in the wrong direction, that is, shrinking a numerator or enlarging a denominator.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient), (d) (multiplying inequalities).

Exercise (C2: Squares over powers)

Let r>1 and h:=r−1. Show that n2rn→0. Start: by Corollary 1.2.4 (b) with k=3, rn≥n(n−1)(n−2)6h3 for n≥3. Say which method this is, then complete it.

Solution (Hint 1). Bound n−1 and n−2 below by multiples of n, for n≥4.

Solution (Hint 2). For n≥4, n−2≥n2, since this rearranges to n2≥2. Find a similar bound for n−1, then multiply.

Solution. The method: bound the power from below, as in Example (Method: bound a power from below). The start wrote r=1+h and kept one term, with k=3, one more than the power of n on top. What remains is to bound n(n−1)(n−2) below and finish the limit.

The lower bound. Let n≥4. Then n−1≥3n4, since this rearranges to n4≥1. Also n−2≥n2, since this rearranges to n2≥2. Both sides of both inequalities are non-negative. So we may multiply them, with 0≤n≤n as the third factor, and get n(n−1)(n−2)≥n⋅3n4⋅n2=3n38. Hence rn≥3n38⋅6h3=n3h316>0(n≥4).

The limit. Inverting, which reverses the inequality, and multiplying by n2>0, we get n2rn≤16nh3 for n≥4. Let ε>0, take an integer N′>16h3ε and N:=max{4,N′}. It depends on ε and r. For n≥N, |n2rn−0|≤16nh3≤16Nh3<ε. Hence n2/rn→0.

What a complete answer needs. (6 points)

  • 1: names the method (bounding a power from below).
  • 2: linear lower bounds for n−1 and n−2 on a stated, justified range n≥n0.
  • 1: their product, with non-negativity checked, and the inversion, with positivity stated.
  • 2: the choice of N, and the strict chain ending in <ε.

Slips that lose the step. Using n−1≥3n4 or n−2≥n2 without the range n≥4. Multiplying inequalities without checking that the factors are non-negative.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (d) (multiplying inequalities, twice), (c) (larger denominator, smaller quotient).