1.5  Roots and Rational Powers

Number Systems, Chapter 6 found a as the supremum of the numbers whose square stays below a (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 6.1.4). The same construction gives every n-th root, and the factorization of tn−sn from Section 1.1 makes it work for every exponent. Roots then give powers with rational exponents, am/n, once we check that the value does not depend on how the fraction mn is written. These are the “real powers” of the chapter title as far as this chapter goes: rational exponents of positive reals. Chapter 8 extends them to every real exponent. The section ends with two estimates that make the limits an→1 and nn→1 routine.

1.5.1. n-th roots

For n=2, Number Systems, Chapter 6 built the square root as the supremum of a set (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 6.1.4). An exercise there did the same for cube roots (Number Systems: From N to R, Exercise (B2: Cube roots)). For a general exponent the construction is the same. Only the estimate for (s+h)n needs a new tool, and Lemma 1.1.8 supplies it. Here n⋅1R is written n. Powers in R are those of Proposition 1.1.1 with R=R. They follow the same recursion as Number Systems: From N to R, Definition 4.2.1 (b).

For example, 2 is the cube root of 8: it is non-negative, and 23=8. No other non-negative number has cube 8. The lemma says the same for every a≥0 and every exponent n≥1.

Lemma 1.5.1 (Real n-th Roots)

Let n∈N with n≥1.

Idea. Part (a) is the factorization tn−sn=(t−s)(tn−1+tn−2s+⋯+sn−1): both factors are positive. For (b), let s be the supremum of the set S of non-negative y with yn≤a, and rule out sn<a and sn>a.

If sn<a, we want h>0 with (s+h)n≤a. Working backwards: for 0<h≤1, the same factorization writes (s+h)n−sn as h times a sum of n terms, each at most (s+1)n−1. So (s+h)n−sn≤h⋅n(s+1)n−1, and it is enough that this be at most half the room a−sn. That gives h:=min{1,(a−sn)/(2n(s+1)n−1)}.

If sn>a, we want h>0 with (s−h)n≥a still, which makes s−h a smaller upper bound. Now sn−(s−h)n≤h⋅nsn−1, and it is enough that this equal the excess sn−a. That gives h:=(sn−a)/(nsn−1).

Before reading on: where is completeness used, and why must h≤1 in the first case?

Proof. Three facts are used throughout. All three rest on Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c), or equality.

  • (i) A power of a non-negative real number is non-negative, and a power of a positive one is positive. This is induction on the exponent.
  • (ii) If 0≤y≤1, then yk≤y for every k≥1. If y≥1, then yk≥y. Both are induction, with yk+1=yky.
  • (iii) If 0≤x≤x′ and 0≤y≤y′, then xy≤x′y≤x′y′. Each step multiplies by a non-negative number.
  • (a) By Lemma 1.1.8 in the commutative ring R, tn−sn=(t−s)∑k=0n−1tksn−1−k. Every term of the sum is ≥0, and the term with k=n−1 is tn−1>0, since t>s≥0. So the sum is ≥tn−1>0. Also t−s>0. Hence tn−sn>0 (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c)).

  • (b) Uniqueness. If b,c≥0 and b≠c, say b<c, then bn<cn by (a); so at most one non-negative b has bn=a.

Existence. If a=0, then b:=0 works, since 0n=0n−1⋅0=0. Let a>0, and let S:={y∈R:y≥0 and yn≤a}. Put m:=min{1,a}>0. Since 0<m≤1, mn≤m≤a, so m∈S. Put M:=max{1,a}. If y>M, then y>1, so yn≥y>M≥a and y∉S; hence M is an upper bound of S. Since R is a complete ordered field (Number Systems: From N to R, Theorem 5.5.2), S has a supremum; let s:=supS. Then s≥m>0.

Case sn<a. Let h:=min{1,a−sn2n(s+1)n−1}. It depends only on a, n and s, and h>0, since a−sn>0 and 2n(s+1)n−1>0. By Lemma 1.1.8, (s+h)n−sn=h∑k=0n−1(s+h)ksn−1−k. Since 0≤s<s+h≤s+1, each term satisfies (s+h)ksn−1−k≤(s+1)k(s+1)n−1−k=(s+1)n−1. This uses (a) or equality, the third fact, and the rule for adding exponents. A sum of n terms, each at most (s+1)n−1, is at most n(s+1)n−1. Hence (s+h)n≤sn+h⋅n(s+1)n−1≤sn+a−sn2<a. So s+h∈S, and s+h>s, against s being an upper bound of S.

Case sn>a. Let h:=sn−ansn−1, which depends only on a, n and s, and is positive. Since a>0, we have sn−a<sn≤nsn, so h<sn/(nsn−1)=s/n≤s; thus 0<s−h<s. By Lemma 1.1.8 and the same bound, with 0<s−h<s, each of the n terms of ∑k=0n−1sk(s−h)n−1−k is at most sn−1, so sn−(s−h)n≤h⋅nsn−1=sn−a, that is, (s−h)n≥a. Now let y∈S. If y>s−h, then (a) gives yn>(s−h)n≥a, against y∈S. So y≤s−h, and s−h is an upper bound of S smaller than s, against s being the least upper bound.

Both cases are impossible, so sn=a by trichotomy, and b:=s≥0 works.

For n=2, the number a2 is non-negative and squares to a, so it is a, by the uniqueness in Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 6.1.4.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Definition 5.5.1 (bounded sets have suprema); Proposition 1.1.1 (a) (adding exponents); Proposition 1.1.5 (b), (c) (one term of a sum of non-negative terms; termwise bound).

The two values of h were found by working backwards from what we wanted. Each depends on a, n and s only. Completeness was used once, to produce s. For a>0 the root is positive, since 0n=0≠a. For instance 83=2 and 44=2, since 23=8 and (2)4=((2)2)2=4, and both are non-negative. In this chapter the symbol an is used only for non-negative real a. Chapter 8 adds odd roots of negative reals, and Chapter 3 shows why it could not mean “the” n-th root of a complex number.

The last example already used the working principle of this section. To identify a root, we do not compute it: we take a candidate, check that it is non-negative, and check that its n-th power is a. Uniqueness in part (b) does the rest. Each equation between roots follows this way from a rule for powers.

Lemma 1.5.2 (Rules for n-th Roots)

Let n,m≥1 be integers and a,b∈R with a,b≥0.

  • (a) abn=anbn.
  • (b) amn=(an)m.
  • (c) anm=amn.
  • (d) If a<b, then an<bn.

Idea. Each of (a)–(c) says that some non-negative number is a certain root. So we raise the right side to the relevant power, compute with the laws of powers, and let the uniqueness in Lemma 1.5.1 (b) identify it. Number Systems identified inverses the same way (Number Systems: From N to R, Lemma 4.1.1): name the defining property, check it, use uniqueness. Part (d) is the converse of part (a) of Lemma 1.5.1, proved by contradiction.

Proof. Write x:=an and y:=bn, so x,y≥0, xn=a and yn=b. Powers and products of non-negative reals are non-negative (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c), by induction for powers).

  • (a) The number xy is ≥0, and (xy)n=xnyn=ab by Proposition 1.1.1 (c). By the uniqueness in Lemma 1.5.1 (b), xy=abn.

  • (b) The number xm is ≥0, and by Proposition 1.1.1 (b), used twice with mn=nm, (xm)n=xmn=(xn)m=am. By uniqueness, xm=amn.

  • (c) Let z:=xm, so z≥0 and zm=x. By Proposition 1.1.1 (b), zmn=(zm)n=xn=a. By uniqueness with the exponent mn≥1, z=amn.

  • (d) Let a<b, and suppose y≤x. If y=x, then b=yn=xn=a. If y<x, then b=yn<xn=a by Lemma 1.5.1 (a), since 0≤y. Both contradict a<b. So x<y.

Part (d) and Lemma 1.5.1 (a) together say that for non-negative reals, a<b holds if and only if an<bn: taking an n-th root and raising to the n-th power both preserve strict order. That two-way comparison is how roots are compared without computing them, as in Example (Rational powers by hand) below.

Quick check. Simplify 643 in two ways.

Solution. By Lemma 1.5.2 (c) with m=3, n=2, it is 646=2, since 2≥0 and 26=64. Directly, 64=8 (as 8≥0 and 82=64), and 83=2.

1.5.2. Integer powers

A rational exponent mn may have a negative numerator, so before we can define am/n we need am for negative integers m. There is only one sensible choice. If the law am+k=amak is to survive, then a−kak=a0=1, so a−k has to be the inverse of ak. For instance, 2−3 must be the inverse of 23=8, which is 18=(12)3. The definition makes this so, and it works in every field. Chapter 3 meets it again in C, in an exercise.

Definition 1.5.1 (Integer Powers)

Let F be a field, a∈F with a≠0, and n∈N. Put a−n:=(a−1)n, where the right side is the power of Proposition 1.1.1.

Only n=0 could clash with the earlier meaning: −0=0, and both readings give 1, since a0=1=(a−1)0. For n≥2 the symbol a−n is new. At n=1 it already meant the inverse, and the definition agrees with it: (a−1)1=a−1. The base must be non-zero, since 0 has no inverse. For instance, in R, 2−3=(12)3=18.

Proposition 1.5.3 (Laws of Integer Powers)

Let F be a field, let a,b∈F with a≠0 and b≠0, and let m,n∈Z.

  • (a) am+n=aman.
  • (b) (am)n=amn.
  • (c) (ab)n=anbn.
  • (d) an≠0 and a−n=(an)−1.
  • (e) If F is an ordered field and a>0, then an>0.
  • (f) If F is an ordered field, a>1 and m<n, then am<an.

Idea. Each law is known for exponents in N (Proposition 1.1.1). A negative exponent is a natural one applied to a−1, and (a−1)k=(ak)−1 lets us move the inverse wherever it is needed. So each law splits into sign cases, and each case reduces to N.

The other cases reduce to natural exponents in the same way. One case shows the pattern: (a) with m≥0>n. Write n=−k with k≥1. We use (d) for natural exponents, (a−1)k=(ak)−1, proved first among the sign cases below. If m≥k, then am=am−kak, so ama−k=am−kak(ak)−1=am−k=am+n. If m<k, then a−k=(a−1)m(a−1)k−m and am(a−1)m=(aa−1)m=1, so ama−k=(aa−1)m(a−1)k−m=(a−1)k−m=a−(k−m)=am+n. Both computations use only the laws for natural exponents, parts (a) and (c) of Proposition 1.1.1, together with that identity and 1m=1.

Second readingThe sign cases for integer powers

Proof. Throughout, exponents written j,k,ℓ are in N, and laws “for N” are Proposition 1.1.1. Note 1k=1 for every k (induction: 1k+1=1k⋅1).

  • (d) Natural exponents. For k∈N, ak≠0 by part (d) for N, and ak(a−1)k=(aa−1)k=1k=1 by part (c) for N. By Number Systems: From N to R, Lemma 4.1.1 (a), a−k=(a−1)k=(ak)−1, and it is non-zero, since its product with ak is 1≠0. Negative exponents. For n=−k with k≥1, an=(ak)−1≠0, and (an)−1=((ak)−1)−1=ak=a−n by Number Systems: From N to R, Lemma 4.1.1 (a). So (d) holds for every n∈Z. In particular, for every n∈Z, (∗)a−n=(a−1)n, by the definition for n≥0, and for n=−k<0 because both sides equal ak: the right side is ((a−1)−1)k=ak.

  • (e) Both m,n≥0: part (a) for N. Both negative: let m=−j and n=−k. By the definition and part (a) for N applied to a−1, am+n=(a−1)j+k=(a−1)j(a−1)k=aman. Mixed signs. The case m≥0>n is the computation above. The case m<0≤n is the same with m and n exchanged, since F is commutative.

  • (f) n=k≥0. If m≥0, this is part (b) for N. If m=−j<0, then (am)k=((a−1)j)k=(a−1)jk=a−jk=amk, by part (b) for N applied to a−1. n=−k<0. Since am≠0 by (d), the definition and (d) give (am)−k=((am)−1)k=(a−m)k, and the case just proved, with exponents −m∈Z and k≥0, gives (a−m)k=a−mk=amn.

  • (g) n=k≥0: part (c) for N. n=−k<0: ab≠0 and (ab)−1=a−1b−1 (Number Systems: From N to R, Lemma 4.1.1 (a)), so (ab)−k=(a−1b−1)k=(a−1)k(b−1)k=a−kb−k.

  • (h) For k∈N, ak>0 by induction: a0=1>0, and if ak>0, then ak+1=aka>0⋅a=0 by Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c). (This is the proof of Sets and Functions, Proposition 3.3.4 (e), which works in any ordered field.) For n=−k<0, a−1>0 by Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 3.2.2 (a), so an=(a−1)k>0 by the case just proved.

  • (i) First, aℓ>1 for every ℓ≥1, by induction: a1=a>1, and if aℓ>1, then aℓ+1=aℓa>1⋅a=a>1, by Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c) with the positive factor a. Now let m<n, and put ℓ:=n−m≥1. By (a), an=amaℓ, and am>0 by (e). Multiplying aℓ>1 by am>0 (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 2.4.3 (c)) gives an>am.

Quick check. Compute 2−3⋅42 and (23)−2 in R.

Solution. 2−3=(12)3=18 and 42=16, so the product is 168=2. (Alternatively, 42=(22)2=24 and 2−324=21 by Proposition 1.5.3 (b), (a).) And (23)−2=(32)2=94, since the inverse of 23 is 32.

1.5.3. Rational powers

Which number should 82/3 be? Reading the exponent as “square of the cube root” gives (83)2=22=4. But 23=46, and reading 46 the same way gives (86)4. That is 4 again, as it must be if the notation is to mean anything: its sixth power is 84=4096=46. A definition that picks one way of writing the exponent is a definition by representatives, and it is only a definition if every representative gives the same value.

A rational power is a power of a root, and it does not matter which fraction names the exponent.

Definition 1.5.2 (Rational Powers)

Let a∈R with a>0, and let r∈Q. Write r=mn with m∈Z and n∈Z>0, and put ar:=(an)m.

In words: take the n-th root of the base, which is positive since a>0, and raise it to the integer power m of Definition 1.5.1. The base is strictly positive, so that negative m is allowed. Negative bases cannot be admitted at all; an example after the next proposition shows why.

The definition chose one fraction for r, and every rational number has infinitely many. So there is something to check before ar means anything.

Proposition 1.5.4 (Rational Powers Are Well Defined)

Let a∈R with a>0. If m,p∈Z and n,q∈Z>0 satisfy mn=pq, then (an)m=(aq)p. For r=m∈Z, the number ar is the integer power am of Definition 1.5.1, and for r=1n it is an.

Try it first (ten minutes): show (a2)1=(a4)2, then say what the general proof must compare.

Idea. The attempt runs into the fact that we cannot compute either root, so we cannot compare them directly. In the trial case, squaring the right side gives ((a4)2)2=a, so it is the non-negative number with square a: uniqueness of square roots identifies it. In general, raise both candidates to the power nq, which clears both roots: the left side becomes amq and the right side apn, and mq=pn is what mn=pq means. Two positive numbers with the same nq-th power are equal by Lemma 1.5.1 (b). This is the method of Sets and Functions, Example (Method: checking that a definition on classes is well defined): two representatives, their relation unwound, equal outputs.

Proof. Let u:=(an)m and v:=(aq)p. The roots are positive since a>0, so u,v>0 by Proposition 1.5.3 (e). By Proposition 1.5.3 (b), used twice with m⋅nq=n⋅mq, unq=(an)mnq=((an)n)mq=amq, and in the same way vnq=((aq)q)pn=apn. Multiplying mn=pq by nq gives mq=pn. Hence unq=vnq, with nq≥1, and the uniqueness in Lemma 1.5.1 (b) with exponent nq gives u=v.

For r=m∈Z, use the representative m1: a1=a, since a≥0 and a1=a, so ar=am. For r=1n, use 1n: ar=(an)1=an.

So ar depends on r alone, and the two special cases say that the new notation extends the old: a3, a−2 and a1/n=an all mean what they meant before.

Warning. Negative bases do not have rational powers. The real number −2 has cube −8, so one might want (−8)1/3=−2. But 13=26, and read through 26 the power would be the square of a sixth root of −8, and no real number has sixth power −8, since an even power is ≥0. Reading 26 as “sixth root of the square” gives ((−8)2)1/6=641/6=2, positive. No value is independent of the representative, which is why Definition 1.5.2 asks for a>0.

With well-definedness in hand, the laws come almost for free. For instance, 81/3⋅81/3=2⋅2=4, and 82/3=4 as computed above: the first law below says this always works. Any two rational exponents can be written over one denominator. Then most laws become statements about integer powers of one root an.

Proposition 1.5.5 (Laws of Rational Powers)

Let a,b∈R with a>0 and b>0, and let r,s∈Q.

  • (a) ar+s=aras.
  • (b) (ar)s=ars.
  • (c) (ab)r=arbr.
  • (d) ar>0.
  • (e) If a>1 and r<s, then ar<as.
  • (f) If a<b and r>0, then ar<br.

Idea. Write r=mn and s=pn over a common denominator n>0; Proposition 1.5.4 allows any representative. Then ar=cm and as=cp with c:=an, and (a), (d), (e) become laws of integer powers of c (Proposition 1.5.3).

Proof. Write r=m′n′ and s=p′q′ with n′,q′>0, and put n:=n′q′>0, m:=m′q′, p:=p′n′. Then r=mn and s=pn. Let c:=an>0. By Proposition 1.5.4, ar=cm and as=cp.

  • (a) Since r+s=m+pn, Proposition 1.5.4 gives ar+s=cm+p. Adding integer exponents, cm+p=cmcp=aras.

  • (b) Let a>1. Then c>1: otherwise c≤1, and either c=1 and a=1n=1, or 0<c<1 and a=cn<1n=1 by Lemma 1.5.1 (a); both contradict a>1. From r<s, multiplying by n>0, we get m<p. By Proposition 1.5.3 (f), ar=cm<cp=as.

Uses: Proposition 1.5.3 (a) (adding integer exponents).

Second readingProofs of (b), (c), (d), (f)

Proof. Keep r=mn, c=an as above.

  • (d) ar=cm>0 by Proposition 1.5.3 (e), since c>0.

  • (e) Here it is convenient to write s=pq with its own denominator q>0. Let w:=ar, which is positive by (d). Let u:=ws=(ar)s and v:=ars, where rs=mpnq. Both u and v are positive by (d). Every change of the form (xi)j=xij=(xj)i below is Proposition 1.5.3 (b). By the definition, wn=(cm)n=(cn)m=am, and uq=((wq)p)q=((wq)q)p=wp. Hence unq=(uq)n=(wp)n=(wn)p=(am)p=amp. Also v=(anq)mp, so vnq=((anq)nq)mp=amp. So unq=vnq, and the uniqueness in Lemma 1.5.1 (b) with exponent nq gives u=v. This covers m≤0 and p≤0 as well, because only integer-power laws were used.

  • (f) By Lemma 1.5.2 (a), abn=anbn, and both factors are positive. By Proposition 1.5.3 (c), (ab)r=(anbn)m=(an)m(bn)m=arbr.

  • (g) Let a<b and r>0. Since r=mn>0 and n>0, m≥1. Let d:=bn. By Lemma 1.5.2 (d), 0<c<d. By Lemma 1.5.1 (a) with the exponent m≥1, ar=cm<dm=br.

Part (e) needs a>1: for a=1 every power is 1, and for 0<a<1 the order reverses, as Exercise C1 shows. Part (f) needs r>0: for r=0 both sides are 1.

Example (Rational powers by hand)

Compute 272/3⋅9−1/2 and (1681)−3/4. Which is larger, 21/2 or 31/3?

Solution. Since 3≥0 and 33=27, 273=3, so 272/3=32=9. Since 9=3, 9−1/2=3−1=13. The product is 9⋅13=3.

Since 23≥0 and (23)4=1681, 16/814=23. So (1681)−3/4=(23)−3=(32)3=278.

For the comparison, raise both to the sixth power, which clears both roots: by Proposition 1.5.5 (b), (21/2)6=23=8 and (31/3)6=32=9. Both numbers are positive. If 21/2≥31/3, then 8≥9 by Lemma 1.5.1 (a) (or equality), which is false. So 21/2<31/3.

1.5.4. Means and estimates with roots

Section 1.3 proved the inequality between the means in the form a1⋯an≤An, without roots, because none were available. With n-th roots it takes its familiar shape. For the two numbers 2 and 8, the geometric mean is 2⋅8=4, and the arithmetic mean is 2+82=5.

Corollary 1.5.6 (Geometric Mean Below Arithmetic Mean)

Let n≥1 be an integer and let a1,…,an∈R with ak≥0 for every k. Then a1a2⋯ann≤1n∑k=1nak, with equality if and only if a1=a2=⋯=an.

Idea. This is Theorem 1.3.3 with an n-th root taken on both sides. The theorem bounds the product Gn, and the root turns that bound into one on G. Taking roots preserves order by Lemma 1.5.2 (d).

Uses: Example (Method: bound a product by a power) (bounding the product).

Proof. Let A:=1n∑ak≥0 and G:=a1⋯ann≥0. By Theorem 1.3.3 (a), Gn=a1⋯an≤An. If G>A, then Gn>An by Lemma 1.5.1 (a), since A≥0; so G≤A. If G=A, then a1⋯an=An, and Theorem 1.3.3 (b) gives a1=⋯=an. Conversely, if all ak are equal, then a1⋯an=An by Theorem 1.3.3 (b), so G=Ann=A by uniqueness, as A≥0.

The last results of this chapter turn roots into estimates. How close to 1 is an for large n? Write the root as 1+x with x≥0. Then a=(1+x)n, and a power of 1+x is exactly what Example (Method: bound a power from below) bounds from below by one term. A lower bound on (1+x)n is an upper bound on x. For instance, 83=2, and part (a) below gives the bound 83≤1+8−13=103.

Proposition 1.5.7 (Two Root Estimates)
  • (a) If a∈R, a≥1 and n≥1 is an integer, then 1≤an≤1+a−1n.
  • (b) If n≥2 is an integer, then 1≤nn≤1+2n−1.

Idea. The method of Example (Method: bound a power from below), read for a root: write the root as 1+x, keep one term of (1+x)n, solve for x. For (a), Bernoulli’s term nx suffices, because the left side a is fixed. For (b) the left side is n, which grows, so the linear term gives only x≤n−1n; the quadratic term (n2)x2 is needed.

Proof. In both parts let y be the number in question, y:=an or y:=nn, and let x:=y−1. Since 1n=1 (as 1≥0 and 1n=1), Lemma 1.5.2 (d) gives y≥1 whenever the radicand is ≥1, with equality if it is 1. So x≥0, which is the left inequality in both parts.

Uses: Proposition 1.2.2 (c) (the value of (n2)).

Both bounds are explicit for every n, so a threshold for any tolerance can be read off. The limit statements follow at once by Number Systems: From N to R, Example (Method: proving a limit from the definition).

Example (Roots tend to one)

Show that an→1 for every real a≥1, and that nn→1.

Solution. First limit. By Proposition 1.5.7 (a), |an−1|=an−1≤a−1n for n≥1. If a=1, the sequence is constant. If a>1, let ε>0, choose an integer N>(a−1)/ε, so N≥1; it depends on a and ε only. For n≥N, |an−1|≤a−1n≤a−1N<ε.

Second limit. By Proposition 1.5.7 (b), |nn−1|≤2/(n−1) for n≥2. Let ε>0 and choose an integer N>1+2/ε2; then N≥2, and N depends on ε only. For n≥N, n−1>2/ε2>0, so 2n−1<ε2 (Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 3.2.2 (b)). Square roots preserve strict order between non-negative numbers (Lemma 1.5.2 (d) with n=2). So 2/(n−1)<ε2=ε. Hence |nn−1|<ε.

Quick check. Find an N with 5n<1.01 for every n≥N.

Solution. By Proposition 1.5.7 (a) with a=5, 5n≤1+4n. And 1+4n<1.01 exactly when 4n<1100, that is, n>400. So N=401 works. (The bound is generous: already 5162<1.01. The definition asks for some threshold, not the least.)

Remark (Looking ahead). Chapter 8 defines ax for every real x through the exponential function and checks that it agrees with the ar of this section; the analysis volumes construct the exponential itself.

1.5.5. Exercises

A. Check your understanding

Exercise (A1)
  • (a) Where does the proof of Lemma 1.5.1 use that R is complete?
  • (b) Why is h≤1 imposed in the case sn<a of that proof?
  • (c) Run the first steps of the existence proof for n=3, a=8: what are m, M and s?
  • (d) Compute 8−2/3.
  • (e) True or false: (ar)s=ars for all real a>0 and all r,s∈Q.

Solution.

  • (a) Once: to produce s:=supS, from a non-empty set bounded above. Nothing else in the proof needs it.

  • (b) So that s+h≤s+1. Then each of the n terms (s+h)ksn−1−k is at most (s+1)n−1, a bound that does not involve h, and h can be solved for. Without h≤1 the terms would grow with h.

  • (c) m=min{1,8}=1, M=max{1,8}=8, and s=sup{y≥0:y3≤8}=2: the proof shows s3=8, and 2 is the non-negative number with cube 8.

  • (d) 83=2, so 8−2/3=2−2=14.

  • (e) True: Proposition 1.5.5 (b).

B. Practice

Exercise (B1: Simplify)

Simplify, for real a,b>0:

  • (a) 323/5;
  • (b) (a1/2b−1/3)6;
  • (c) 43/282/3.

Solution.

  • (a) 325=2, since 25=32; so 323/5=23=8.

  • (b) By Proposition 1.5.5 (c) and (b), (a1/2b−1/3)6=(a1/2)6(b−1/3)6=a3b−2.

  • (c) 43/2=(4)3=23=8 and 82/3=(83)2=22=4, so the quotient is 84=2.

Exercise (B2: Compare without a calculator)

Put 31/3, 21/2 and 51/5 in increasing order. Justify your answer.

Solution. Raise all three to the power 30, a common multiple of 3, 2, 5. By the law (ar)s=ars, (31/3)30=310=59049,(21/2)30=215=32768,(51/5)30=56=15625. All three numbers are positive, and for positive x,y, x30<y30 forces x<y: otherwise y≤x and y30≤x30 by Lemma 1.5.1 (a) (or equality). Hence 51/5<21/2<31/3.

Uses: Proposition 1.5.5 (b) (powers of powers).

Exercise (B3: An explicit N)

Find an N such that nn<1.1 for every n≥N.

Solution. By Proposition 1.5.7 (b), nn≤1+2/(n−1) for n≥2, so it suffices that 2/(n−1)<0.1. Both sides are non-negative. Squaring and taking square roots both preserve strict order between non-negative numbers. So this holds exactly when 2n−1<0.01, that is, when n−1>200. So N=202 works: for n≥202, nn≤1+2/(n−1)<1.1.

Uses: Lemma 1.5.1 (a) (squaring preserves order); Lemma 1.5.2 (d) (square roots preserve order).

C. Going deeper

Exercise (C1: Chapter check: powers of a base below one)

Let a∈R with 0<a<1, and let r,s∈Q. Prove:

  • (i) if r<s, then ar>as;
  • (ii) if r>0, then ar<1.

Solution. Put b:=1a. Since 0<a<1, Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 3.2.2 (b) gives b>11=1. For every t∈Q, 1t=1: with t=mn, 1n=1 by uniqueness (as 1≥0 and 1n=1), and 1m=1 for every m∈Z by Proposition 1.5.3 (d). So, by Proposition 1.5.5 (c), atbt=(ab)t=1t=1, and at=(bt)−1 for every t∈Q.

What a complete answer needs. (10 points) - 2: reduces to a base above one, b=1a>1, with the reason. - 3: the link to that base, at=(bt)−1 from (c) of the laws and 1t=1. - 2: the law (e) applied to a base above one, not to a. - 2: the reversal of order under reciprocals, with positivity from (d). - 1: (ii) from (i), with a0=1.

Alternatively, over a common denominator r=mn, s=pn:

  • 3: c=an∈(0,1) with the reason, and m<p.
  • 2: cp−m<1, with the reason (for instance (1/c)p−m>1).
  • 2: cp=cmcp−m<cm, using cm>0.
  • 2: the conclusion ar=cm>cp=as.
  • 1: (ii) from (i), with a0=1. Slips that lose the step: applying (e) to a base a<1.
Exercise (C2: The compound sequence is bounded)

Show that (1+1n)n<3 for every integer n≥1.

Solution (Hint 1). Expand by the binomial theorem and compare the term (nk)1nk with 1k!.

Solution (Hint 2). By Proposition 1.2.2 (c), (nk)1nk=1k!∏j=0k−1n−jn.

Solution. Let n≥1. By Theorem 1.2.3 with x=1n, y=1, (1+1n)n=∑k=0n(nk)1nk. The term k=0 is 1. Let 1≤k≤n. By Proposition 1.2.2 (c), (nk)k!=∏j=0k−1(n−j), and nk=∏j=0k−1n, so (nk)1nk=1k!∏j=0k−1n−jn. For 0≤j≤k−1≤n−1, the factor n−jn lies in (0,1]. So the product lies in (0,1], by induction on the number of factors. Hence the term is at most 1k!, and 1k!≤12k−1 by Example (Factorials beat powers of two). Comparing termwise and summing the geometric series with ratio 12, (1+1n)n≤1+∑k=1n(12)k−1=1+2(1−12n)=3−22n<3, where the last step uses 22n>0.

Together with Example (The compound-interest sequence increases), which showed that the sequence increases, this says the compound sequence is increasing and bounded above by 3.

Uses: Number Systems: From N to R, Proposition 4.1.2 (d) (products of factors in (0,1]); Proposition 1.1.5 (a) (termwise comparison); Sets and Functions, Proposition 3.3.6 (the geometric sum).

What a complete answer needs. (10 points) - 3: the binomial expansion, with each term written in the factorial form. - 3: the termwise bound (nk)n−k≤1k!, with the factors n−jn shown to lie in (0,1], and 1k! bounded by a summable comparison sequence (for instance 12k−1), with reason. - 2: the comparison sum evaluated exactly (geometric or telescoping). - 2: the strict inequality <3, with its reason. Slips that lose the step: bounding (nk)n−k by 1k! without the factor-by-factor reason, or summing the comparison series to infinity.

R. Review

Exercise (R1)

Compute ∑k=1n1k+k+1 for n≥1.

Solution. The tool is telescoping (Example (Method: telescoping)). Since k+1>0, k+1>0, so k+k+1>0. Since (k+1−k)(k+1+k)=(k+1)−k=1, 1k+k+1=k+1−k. With bj:=j+1 and j=k−1, Theorem 1.1.7 (a) gives ∑k=1n(k+1−k)=∑j=0n−1(bj+1−bj)=bn−b0=n+1−1.

Exercise (R2)

Compute ∑k=0n(nk)(−2)k for n∈N.

Solution. By the binomial theorem (Theorem 1.2.3) in R with x=−2 and y=1, the sum is (−2+1)n=(−1)n.

Exercise (R3)

Prove that n+nn2+1→0.

Solution. The first tool is keeping the dominant term (Example (Method: keep the dominant term)). The second is proving a limit from the definition (Number Systems: From N to R, Example (Method: proving a limit from the definition)). For n≥1, n≤n2, so n≤n2=n by Lemma 1.5.2 (d) (or equality). Here n2=n by uniqueness, since n≥0. Hence the numerator is at most 2n. The denominator is at least n2>0, so 0<n+nn2+1≤2nn2=2n(n≥1). Let ε>0 and choose an integer N>2/ε; then N≥1, and N depends on ε only. For n≥N the distance to 0 is at most 2/n≤2/N<ε.

The look-alike tool, the quotient rule for limits, does not apply to the fraction as written: neither the numerator nor the denominator converges.