Section 3.1 defined groups and proved their basic
laws. After a structure comes the substructure. The even
integers sit inside and form a group on their own, with the same
addition; so do the multiples of , of , and of , which is just . Are there any
other subgroups of ? Number Systems:
From to , Section 3.4
answered the same question for ideals, which are closed
under multiplication by every integer (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.2).
Here the multiplication is gone, and the answer is the
same: this section proves that the subgroups of are exactly the
sets with
.
Subgroups
A subset of a group can fail to be a group with the
inherited operation in three ways: a product can leave
it, the identity can be missing, or an inverse can be
missing. The definition rules out all three.
A subgroup is a subset that contains the identity
and is closed under products and inverses.
Definition
3.2.1 (Subgroup)
Let be a
group. A subset is a subgroup of if , and and for
all .
In words: the identity of is in ; multiplying two
elements of never
leaves ; and the
inverse in of an
element of lies
in . We say “ is a subgroup of ” in words and use no
symbol for it; in this chapter always means the
order of .
Then the operation of restricts to a binary
operation , and
is a group with it: (G1) holds in because it holds in
, and (G2), (G3)
hold because and
the inverses lie in . The identity of the
group is the
identity of , and the inverse of
in is its inverse in , by the uniqueness in
Theorem 3.1.1
(1) and (2). Three conditions are a lot to check; in
practice one checks that is non-empty and a
single combined condition.
Theorem
3.2.1 (Subgroup Test)
Let be a group
and .
Then is a
subgroup of if
and only if and for all
.
Proof. If is a subgroup, then
, so . For
we have
, and
then ,
since is closed
under products.
Suppose and for all
. Pick
. Taking
gives
.
For , taking
gives .
For , we
now know , so by Theorem 3.1.1
(3). Hence is a
subgroup. This proves the theorem.
In additive notation the test reads: and for all , where .
Example
(Subgroups)
Check that each of the following is a subgroup.
- (a) and , in any group .
- (b) in , for ; more generally
, for
(Number Systems: From to , Definition 3.2.1).
- (c) and in .
- (d) in
;
in
.
- (e) In the group of
bijections of a set (Example (Groups)
(c)), the bijections that fix a chosen
point ,
that is, .
- (f) , the
unit circle ,
and, for ,
the set of
-th roots of
unity, in (Chapter 1).
Solution. In each case we use Theorem 3.2.1,
or Definition 3.2.1
directly.
(a) is non-empty, and
. is non-empty, since
, and because the
operation is a binary operation. The trivial
subgroup is the smallest
subgroup of every group: by the definition, every
subgroup contains .
(b) (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.2
(b), with (F6)). For , by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.2
(c), then (F9) with (F6). In the same way , and . So both are subgroups, by the additive
form of the test. For instance is the set of even
integers, and .
(c) For : (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.2
(c)), so each of is its own inverse, and the products , , lie in the
set; so it is a subgroup by the definition. For : it contains
, which is
positive (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.5
(e)). Let . Then by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.5.2
(a). So by (O4), being an ordered
field (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 2.5.1).
(d) For classes, (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.1
(b)). For , the difference is one of , and
, in (since and ). So every
difference lies in . For : , since
,
so the four quotients , , , lie in
the set.
(e) The identity map fixes , so the set is
non-empty. Let and fix . Applying to gives
, so . Section 3.4 uses this
subgroup for and .
(f)
is a field (Theorem 1.2.4), so
is a group by Example (Groups)
(b). Recall that (Proposition 1.1.1,
with the identification of inside made after it).
For : products of two of are , products of with are , and products of
two of are
(signs by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.2
(c)). So the set is closed under products, and it
contains . Each of
, is its own inverse,
and , so and . It is a subgroup by the definition.
For : by Proposition 1.5.1
(a), which rests on the modulus rule
of Theorem 1.2.2 (d),
, for , and each
is
non-zero with . So , and is a subgroup by the
definition.
For , the
set of
with
(Chapter 1’s notation, after Example (Roots of Unity)):
,
since for ; so , and there is the power of Definition 3.1.3,
defined by the same recursion. Also . For ,
since is abelian, by Proposition 3.1.3
(d) and (b). So ,
and is a
subgroup by the test. Chapter 1 also notes that . Its
Section 1.6, Exercise R2 builds a bijection that
sends sums to products; in the words of Section 3.3 this
is an isomorphism of groups. That exercise rests on the
facts about cosine and sine that Chapter 1 borrows, and
nothing in this chapter cites it.
Now non-examples, each a minimal change of an
example. The set contains and is closed under
, but :
the inverses are missing. The odd integers fail more
badly: they do not contain , which is even () and so not
odd (Number Systems: From to , Corollary 3.1.3
(a)). And is non-empty and closed
under multiplication, but :
an integer with
would make
even, and is odd.
Each fails the test at one clause, and each is an
infinite set; for a finite non-empty
subset, closure under products alone suffices (Exercise
C1).
Subgroups can be combined. If two subgroups are
given, the elements they share form a subgroup again,
and so do the elements shared by any family of
subgroups:
Proof. Write . Since and for every , , so . Let . Then , and for each , , so by Theorem 3.2.1
applied to the subgroup . Hence , and is a subgroup by Theorem 3.2.1.
This proves the proposition.
For the empty family the intersection is itself, which is a
subgroup.
Warning. A union of two subgroups
need not be a subgroup. contains and , but not : and , since
neither nor divides (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 3.1.1
(g)). Intersections are safe; unions are not.
The
subgroup generated by one element
Fix .
Which subgroups contain ? Each of them contains
, , …, and their
inverses, so it contains every power . The powers
themselves form a subgroup, and so they are the smallest
possible answer.
Definition
3.2.2 (Subgroup Generated by an Element)
Let be a group
and . The
subgroup generated by is with the powers of Definition 3.1.3.
In additive notation, .
In ,
, since the group multiple is the product
(Proposition 3.1.3
(e)). The name is justified by the next result.
Proposition
3.2.3 (The Subgroup Generated by an
Element)
Let be a group
and . Then
is an abelian subgroup of that contains , and every subgroup of
that contains
contains .
Idea. Both halves are the power
laws at work. The test asks for , which the
laws turn into the single power . Conversely, a
subgroup containing is closed under
products and inverses, and every power is built from
by those two
operations.
Proof. First, , so . For , by Proposition 3.1.3
(b) and (a); so is a subgroup by Theorem 3.2.1.
It is abelian: , by Proposition 3.1.3
(a) and (F1) in .
Now let be a
subgroup of with
. By Logic and Proof, Axiom 4.2.1,
for every
: , and if
, then
, since
is closed under products. For , also
(Proposition 3.1.3
(b)), since is
closed under inverses. Every integer is or for some (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.2.3
(c)), so . This proves the proposition.
So is the smallest subgroup containing
. A group that
equals for one of its elements is called cyclic;
Groups, the chapter “Cyclic Groups”, studies
these groups and the least with .
Examples. If for some , the subgroup
is finite and easy to list. Indeed, divide any by : with (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.1.2
(a)). Then by Proposition 3.1.3
(a) and (c), and by (c) again. So .
- In , for , by Proposition 3.1.3
(c) and (e) and Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(d), where (e) identifies the group multiples with the
ring multiples to which (d) applies: . So the multiples are , and .
By the paragraph above (with ), , the subgroup of Example (Subgroups)
(d).
- In , the
powers of are
, and
.
So .
- In , the
powers are , each obtained from the one
before by multiplying by (for instance ).
Since is a
field (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.5.2),
, as in any field
(the paragraph “Why this definition” after Number Systems: From to , Definition 3.5.1),
so it has the six elements (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(b)), and all of them are powers of : .
The
subgroups of the integers
Every set is a subgroup of . The theorem
says that there are no others, and that is determined by the
subgroup.
Theorem
3.2.4 (Subgroups of the Integers)
Let be a
subgroup of . Then for exactly one : if , and otherwise
is the least
positive element of .
Try it first (ten minutes): find the smallest
subgroup of
containing and
. List a few of
its elements, guess what it is, and say why its least
positive element should divide .
Idea. The attempt finds elements by
subtracting: , , and then every multiple of . That suggests “the
multiples of ”,
but listing gives no reason why nothing else can be in
the subgroup. The guess also points at the right
candidate for :
the least positive element, here. Why should every
element be a multiple of it? Divide an element by . The remainder is minus a multiple of
, so it lies in
the subgroup, and it is smaller than . It cannot be positive,
so it is . This is
the move of Number Systems: From to , Section 3.2,
least positive element, then divide,
now with nothing but subtraction available.
Before reading on: where is used, and why
is the least positive element taken,
not the least element?
Proof. If , then . Suppose , and pick
with . Then , and one of
, is positive (Number Systems: From to , Proposition 3.1.1
(h)). So is non-empty, and it has the lower
bound ; by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.6
it has a least element , the least positive
element of .
Since and
(Proposition 3.1.3
(e)), Proposition 3.2.3
gives .
Let
. Since
, Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.1.2
(a) gives with and . Here , so , since is a subgroup. If , then is a positive element
of smaller than
, against the
choice of . So
, and .
Hence .
For uniqueness, let with . Then , so , and in the same
way ; hence
by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 3.1.1
(f). This proves the theorem.
The answer to the prompt. The hypothesis is used once,
in the first paragraph: it supplies a non-zero element,
hence a positive one, so that the set of positive
elements of is
non-empty and has a least element. The least element of
itself does not
exist when : if were least, then and . And is useless as a
divisor, since division with remainder needs a positive
divisor; the minimality of among the
positive elements is exactly what
forces .
The theorem turns questions about subgroups of into questions about
one number: the least positive element.
Quick check. Which has ?
Solution. . The intersection
is a subgroup (Proposition 3.2.2),
and it contains , so by Theorem 3.2.4
it is with
its least
positive element, the least positive common multiple of
and . The positive
multiples of
below are alone, and is not
a multiple of (by
the uniqueness of the remainder in Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.1.2
(a)), while is.
So .
Exercises
A. Check your
understanding
Exercise
(A1)
These parts are about the proof of Theorem 3.2.4.
- (a) Where is the
minimality of
used?
- (b) Run the proof on
:
find , and the
division of by
.
- (c) The conclusion
fails for the subset of . Which condition of
Definition 3.2.1
does lack, and
which step of the proof breaks?
- (d) State the idea
of the proof in two sentences.
Solution.
- (a) In the step
: the
remainder lies in
and , and
minimality forbids , so .
- (b) is a subgroup (Example (Subgroups)
(b)). Its least positive element is : , and
, since
every element is even and is odd (Number Systems: From to , Corollary 3.1.3
(a)). Dividing by
gives , with
remainder , as the
proof predicts. So .
- (c) lacks inverses: , but . The step
breaks:
there , and
went through and Proposition 3.2.3,
which needs a subgroup; indeed . The first paragraph’s step also fails for
(take ), but harmlessly: a
non-zero
is already positive, so still exists. The step whose failure breaks
the conclusion is . The other
inclusion still holds for : each is , so
.
- (d) The least
positive element
of is the only
candidate. Division by leaves a remainder in
smaller than
, so the remainder
is and every
element is a multiple of .
B. Practice
Exercise
(B1: Put the proof in order)
The following lines contain the proof of the
direction of Theorem 3.2.1,
shuffled, together with two lines that do not belong.
Write the seven correct lines in an order that makes a
proof, say which other orders are also admissible, and
say why each of the other two lines fails.
(i) For , we know .
(ii) Hence is a subgroup of .
(iii) Choose
.
(iv) Taking and : ;
so .
(v) Suppose and for all
.
(vi) So , by Theorem 3.1.1
(3).
(vii) For , taking : .
(viii) , because is closed under
products.
(ix) Taking : .
Solution. The admissible order is
(v), (iii), (ix), (vii), (i), (vi), (ii). Each line uses
the one before it: (iii) uses from (v);
(ix) uses the of
(iii); (vii) takes , which needs from (ix); (i) is (vii) applied to an
arbitrary ; (vi)
needs
from (i); and (ii) collects , inverses and
products. So no other order is admissible: the
dependencies form a single chain.
The distractor (iv) is circular. It takes in the hypothesis,
which is allowed only once is known, and then concludes . Placed before
(ix), it uses what it is meant to prove; placed after
(ix), its first half is a special case of (vii) and its
second half repeats (ix).
The distractor (viii) assumes what is being proved:
closure under products is one of the three conditions of
Definition 3.2.1
that the direction must
establish, and the hypothesis (v) does not state it.
Exercise
(B2: Subgroups of the integers modulo twelve)
Determine which of the following subsets of are
subgroups. Justify your answer.
- (a) .
- (b) .
- (c) .
- (d) .
Then show that every subgroup of that contains
is all of .
Solution. We use the additive form
of Theorem 3.2.1,
with (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.1
(b)).
- (a) A subgroup. For
, , and , , since divides and .
- (b) A subgroup. For
, , and , , .
- (c) Not a subgroup:
, which is not in the set (the remainders
, , are distinct, Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(b)). Equally, is not in the set.
- (d) A subgroup:
,
, and the other differences are and .
Now let be a
subgroup with . By Proposition 3.2.3,
, so . By Proposition 3.1.3
(c) and (e) and Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(d), ,
since . So , and then for every (Proposition 3.2.3,
Proposition 3.1.3
(e) and Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(d) again). Taking gives every class of (Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.3
(b)). Hence .
Exercise
(B3: Integer combinations, once more)
Let , not both . Use Theorem 3.2.4
to prove that , where is the least positive
element of . Compare the proof with the one in
Number Systems: From to , Section
3.2.
Solution. is a subgroup
of (Example (Subgroups)
(b)). It is not : it contains
and , and one of them is non-zero. So by Theorem 3.2.4,
with its least
positive element, which is .
This is Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.2.1
(e), whose is the
same least positive combination. The two proofs are one
argument. Number Systems: From to divided and by and used that the
remainder is again a combination; the proof of Theorem 3.2.4
divides an arbitrary element of the subgroup by and uses only that a
subgroup is closed under subtraction. The second form
applies to every subgroup of , not only to sets of
combinations.
C. Going deeper
Exercise
(C1: Finite subsets closed under products)
Let be a
group, and let be finite, non-empty and closed under
products (
for all ). Prove that is a subgroup of . Then explain why , which
is non-empty and closed under but not a subgroup,
does not contradict this.
The first half of a proof is given.
Let , and
let (Sets, Relations, and Cardinality, Definition 3.1.2).
The powers all lie in , by induction on the
exponent, since .
The last half is blank. Name the move, then
complete it.
Solution. The move is
multiply by the inverse: two equal
powers
become
once is removed
from both sides.
Completion. The map , , goes from
a set with
elements to a set with elements, so it is not
injective (Sets, Relations, and Cardinality, Corollary 3.1.3
(a)): for
some . Multiplying both sides on the left by gives
(Proposition 3.1.3
(b), (a)). Since , is one of the
listed powers, so . Next, if , then (Proposition 3.1.3
(a)), so by Theorem 3.1.1
(2), and since . If , then , and . As was arbitrary, is closed under
inverses; it contains and is closed under
products, so it is a subgroup by Definition 3.2.1.
The set is
not finite, so the result does not apply to it. Read
backwards, the result even proves this: if were finite, it would
be a subgroup of , and it is not, since
.
Marking scheme. (10 points) - 1:
names the move (multiply by the inverse, or cancel ). - 2: gets with
from the pigeonhole principle, cited. - 2: derives with the
power laws named, and concludes from . - 3:
shows :
when ,
and when
. - 1:
concludes that is
a subgroup, by Definition 3.2.1
or Theorem 3.2.1.
- 1: explains that is infinite, so the
result does not apply. Fatal errors (0 for the step):
taken as
one of the listed powers (the list starts at ); asserted
without exhibiting it as a positive power; the case
mishandled so that is claimed to lie in
the list.
Exercise
(C2: Exit check: subgroups of the integers)
State and prove Theorem 3.2.4.
Solution (Hint 1). Look at the
positive elements of , and take the least
one.
Solution (Hint 2). To show that an
element is
a multiple of that least positive element , divide by .
Solution. The statement and proof
of Theorem 3.2.4
are a complete answer. In outline: , or
has a non-zero
element , and then
or , both in , is positive; the least
positive element
exists by Number Systems: From to , Proposition 2.3.6;
because is a
subgroup containing (all multiples , negative included); for , with and , so
by
minimality; and with forces .
Marking scheme. (10 points) - 3: the
case ;
otherwise the existence of a positive element, with the
reason when the chosen element is negative (its inverse
lies in ). - 1:
the least positive element, by a cited well-ordering
result for sets of integers bounded below. - 2: by
closure, with the negative multiples included. - 2:
division of
by , with the
remainder shown to lie in . - 1: minimality of
forces . - 1: uniqueness of
. Fatal
errors (0 for the step): assuming that is an ideal, or citing
Number Systems: From to , Theorem 3.4.2
for (closure
under multiplication by integers is not given; that it
comes free is a consequence of the theorem); “the least
element of ”
without positivity. A proof by induction showing for , followed by
inverses for , earns the 2 points for . A
descent proof (for with , strong induction on : if , then and ;
negative handled
through )
earns the 2 points for division when it shows and treats
negative , and the
1 point for minimality when it rules out .
Exercise
(C3: Inclusions and intersections)
Let .
- (a) Prove that if
and only if .
- (b) Prove that ,
where is the
least positive common multiple of and . Deduce that divides every common
multiple of and
.
Solution (Hint 1). For (a), ask
where itself
lies. For (b), ask what kind of set the intersection
is.
Solution (Hint 2). For (b): is a
subgroup of by
Proposition 3.2.2,
and lies in
it.
Solution.
- (a) , so for some , that is, . If , then every lies in , by (F5).
- (b) By Proposition 3.2.2,
is a
subgroup of . It contains , which is positive by
(O4), so it is not . By Theorem 3.2.4
it equals ,
with its least
positive element. Its elements are exactly the common
multiples of and
, so is the least positive
common multiple. A common multiple lies in , so
.
This is Number Systems: From to , Exercise (B2: The least common multiple),
there proved by dividing by directly; here the
division is done once and for all inside Theorem 3.2.4.
Marking scheme. (10 points) - 2: (a)
uses
to get
. - 1: (a)
shows
. - 2: (b) the intersection is a subgroup
of , by Proposition 3.2.2.
- 2: (b) it is not ( is a positive
element), so Theorem 3.2.4
gives with
its least
positive element. - 2: (b) identifies the intersection
with the set of common multiples, so is the least positive
common multiple. - 1: (b) deduces for every common
multiple . Fatal
errors (0 for the step): (b) applies Theorem 3.2.4
without checking that the intersection is a subgroup;
(b) assumes
or without proof.